| Tired of seeing ads? Click here to upgrade to Elite Membership! |
THESE FORUMS EXIST AS AN ARCHIVE ONLY, PLEASE JOIN IN THE DISCUSSION ON THE MAIN B:iNS SITE.
|
| Author | Message / Information |
| peakyblinder old hand Rank: Chinny | Intellectual debate posted on: 9/24/2003 2:36:59 PM NO PLEASE HELP ME! thinks that Peakyblinder is juvenile. Peakyblinder thinks that NO PLEASE HELP ME! is special needs. This thread has been specifically created so that both NO PLEASE HELP ME! and Peakyblinder can engage in a head-to-head debate which will prove who is intellectually superior. The contest will last for ten posts from each contestant. Please do not contribute to this thread until the contest is over. NO PLEASE HELP ME! will begin with a topic of his/her own choice. Each exchange must be limited to 100 words. Peakyblinder laid down this challenge at 2.30pm GMT on Wednesday 24 September 2003. If the challenge is not accepted within 24 hours, let it be known all over the West Midlands that Peakyblinder is the intellectual superior of NO PLEASE HELP ME! |
|
peakyblinder
old hand Rank: Chinny |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 9/25/2003 2:02:03 PM It is now 2.30pm GMT on Thursday 25 September 2003. NO PLEASE HELP ME! failed to take up the challenge within the time allotted and therefore forfeits his/her right to be described as either intelligent, well-informed, quick-witted, discerning, enlightened or compos mentis. Let it be known all over the West Midlands that Peakyblinder is the intellectual superior of NO PLEASE HELP ME! Let it be trumpeted from the rooftop of Fort Dunlop that NO PLEASE HELP ME! is indeed special needs. Let it be sung by the heavenly choirs of bluenoses down St Andrews that NO PLEASE HELP ME! is a wit of unprecedented dimness. Let it be tattooed across the greasy forehead of Albert Bore that Peakyblinder reigns supreme. Hallelujah, brothers and sisters! Hallelujah! |
|
NO PLEASE HELP ME!
|
Intellectual debate
replied on: 9/25/2003 2:06:28 PM Your game your rules! i'm not going to have an itelectual debate with anyone. reasons: 1 i am not an itelectual 2 i im not a seasoned debator 3 i can't be arsed 4 can't think of anything to debate. if you wish to go away from this feeling in anyway superior to me be my guest as your opinions have no bearing on my life and i am not in anyway bothered about what you or anyone else i dont know think about me. p.s. assuming that you are superior to someone you dont know is fairly dumb. i have nothing to prove! |
|
NO PLEASE HELP ME!
|
Intellectual debate
replied on: 9/25/2003 2:23:19 PM i posted at 2.15!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! god damn it! |
|
NO PLEASE HELP ME!
|
Intellectual debate
replied on: 9/25/2003 2:35:58 PM oh dear oh dear check the times of your posts mr peaky. slightly premature i think! |
|
racheymaus
old hand Rank: Chinny |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 9/25/2003 4:11:49 PM Peaky-liar more like. |
|
peakyblinder
old hand Rank: Chinny |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 9/25/2003 6:58:56 PM It was 2.30 by my clock today, which means it was also 2.30 by my clock yesterday, which means that 24 hours elapsed. |
|
peakyblinder
old hand Rank: Chinny |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 9/25/2003 7:12:28 PM Re: "Your game your rules!" OK, you make up the game, you make up the rules. Re: "i'm not going to have an itelectual debate with anyone." You must live a really interesting life. To what topics of conversation do you limit yourself? The weather? Last night's telly? Beckham's hairstyles? Or do you have no friends with whom to converse? Re: "1 i am not an itelectual." There's no need to state the obvious. Re: "2 i im not a seasoned debator." Ditto. Re: "3 i can't be arsed." Well, what CAN you be arsed about then? Do you have any interests or opinions at all? Re: "4 can't think of anything to debate." Ditto. Re: "if you wish to go away from this feeling in anyway superior to me be my guest as your opinions have no bearing on my life and i am not in anyway bothered about what you or anyone else i dont know think about me." At least I have some opinions. Re: "p.s. assuming that you are superior to someone you dont know is fairly dumb. i have nothing to prove!" OK, maybe I don't know you. So this means that you DO have something to prove, doesn't it? Come on, prove to us that you are actually a sentient being and not some prototype internet robot with no emotions, opinions or interests. |
|
peakyblinder
old hand Rank: Chinny |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 9/29/2003 7:37:51 PM Cat got your tongue? |
|
NO PLEASE HELP ME!
|
Intellectual debate
replied on: 10/1/2003 11:16:05 AM ive been in brum foor the last few days and have been away from the internet doing stuff in the real world but now i'm back! check the times stated on your first two postings knoblord, you quite obviously didnt leave the time allowed by your own rules! unusual for an itelectual to not be able to use a clock! anyway i dont care what you say and i dont find intelectual debabte interesting and i dont care what david beckhams hair is doing this week either. think what you like about me, your opinion is as feeble as my grammer is bad. ps i had a great time in brum didnt see the new bullring though but i'm not into shoping anyway. |
|
peakyblinder
old hand Rank: Chinny |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 10/1/2003 2:13:21 PM Check the time stated on your posting, nancy boy: 6:16:05 AM. I know you didn't post at that time, and everyone knows that clock is wrong anyway, you prize twat. "Knoblord?" Check your gender, arsewipe. I'm a girlie. Scared of getting your ass whupped by a lady, are you? Are you? You underintelligent visiteur. |
|
NO PLEASE HELP ME!
|
Intellectual debate
replied on: 10/1/2003 2:48:14 PM your first two posts were less than 24 hours appart the clock may be wrong but it does run at the right speed (i think?). "knoblord" is a perfectly good name to call anyone regardless of gender. i wont discriminate! why do you want to fight people all the time? i personally dont want to fight anyone especially not a lady! feel free to translate this as fear and notch up an other point in your game. be my guest. |
|
racheymaus
old hand Rank: Chinny |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 10/1/2003 6:16:53 PM No seriously. Peaks, you were wrong, just admit it, mate. |
|
peakyblinder
old hand Rank: Chinny |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 10/2/2003 12:29:49 PM Et tu, Brute? |
|
racheymaus
old hand Rank: Chinny |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 10/2/2003 4:42:09 PM All I'm saying, erm, writing is that the clock doesn't lie. The hours are five hours out, but the minutes are faithful. Think about it. check it out!! A clear example of not counting your hens until they've defrosted. And it's et tu Bruterella. |
|
Gravy Hole
Rank: Oddie |
Intellectual debate
replied on: 10/2/2003 5:35:12 PM As a neutral in this most amusing sidetrack, which as far as I can ascertain has little or nothing to do with Birmingham, I initially noted that Peakyblinder had jumped the gun by some minutes and was waiting for his error to be picked up by someone. So I do feel, Peaky, you owe NPHM some sort of small apology. The form or substance of the apology is not for me to comment upon. Hopefully it will be funny. |
|
LinkBot
|
Gamers Wanted is looking for people to write game reviews and post news, |
|
|
| Tired of seeing ads? Click here to upgrade to Elite Membership! |
ChatArea.com Help & News Forums | Terms of Use | Contact ChatArea.com | Advertising
Powered By ChatArea.com - Get your free Society today! © Copyright 2003 Wewp!