Tired of seeing ads? Click here to upgrade to Elite Membership!


GoreanLibrary -> About Free Women
Control Panel
Log In! | Register
Your User Name:
Your Password:    Forget your password? | Register
Subject:
Message:


Emoticon Listing
HTML Help

Options: Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to stay logged in.
Convert smiles.
Preview your post. (This feature will still post your message,
but you can edit it from there if you need to make changes)


 
Tired of seeing ads? Click here to upgrade to Elite Membership!


Author Message / Information
Librarian






This message was updated on 9/23/2004 7:32:13 AM by Librarian

Going without veils...
replied on: 8/22/2004 12:05:33 AM

quote:
The veil, it might be noted, is not legally imperative for a free woman; it is rather a matter of modesty and custom. Some low-class, uncompanioned, free girls do not wear veils. Similarly certain bold free women neglect the veil. Neglect of the veil is not a crime in Gorean cities, though in some it is deemed a brazen and scandalous omission.
- Slave Girl


We might read that and focus in on the revelation that its not a crime, and some women DO go without veils.

What additional understanding do we gain from reading the paragraphs just before that quote? (Remember, if you are just looking for obscure parts of quotes to support your intentions to play as you will, this is not the section for you. This section is intended for those with a genuine interest in understanding the role they have chosen to play - the Free Woman on Gor)

quote:
. Veils are worn in various numbers and combinations by Gorean free women, this tending to vary by preference and caste. Many low-class Gorean women own only a single veil which must do for all purposes. Not all high-caste women wear a large number of veils. A free woman, publicly, will commonly wear one or two veils; a frequent combination is the light veil, or last veil, and the house or street veil. Rich, vain women of high caste may wear ostentatiously as many as nine or ten veils. In certain cities, in connection with the free companionship, the betrothed or pledged beauty may wear eight veils, several of which are ritualistically removed during various phases of the ceremony of companionship; the final veils, and robes, of course, are removed in private by the male who, following their removal, arms interlocked with the girl, drinks with her the wine of the companionship, after which he completes the ceremony. This sort of thing, however, varies considerably from city to city. In some cities the girl is unveiled, though not disrobed, of course, during the public ceremony. The friends of the male may then express their pleasure and joy in her beauty, and their celebration of the good fortune of their friend. The veil, it might be noted, is not legally imperative for a free woman; it is rather a matter of modesty and custom. Some low-class, uncompanioned, free girls do not wear veils. Similarly certain bold free women neglect the veil. Neglect of the veil is not a crime in Gorean cities, though in some it is deemed a brazen and scandalous omission.
- Slave Girl


It is true, as we see from the quote, that some "low-class, uncompanioned, free girls do not wear veils." And. "certain bold free women neglect the veil."

Low-class, uncompanioned free girls? She-urts, perhaps?

Certain bold free women neglect the veil. Does this mean it is common? Ignored? That they are treated with as much respect as those who follow the customs of society and veil themselves?

It doesn't appear that way -

quote:
"To be sure," I said to Boabissia, "you are in somewhat greater danger than many free women for you have not chosen to veil yourself."
"Alar women do not wear veils," she said. "They are an artifice of civilization, fit rather for perfumed girls who would be better off in collars."
"You are not an Alar woman," said Hurtha.
"I grew up with the wagons," she said, angrily.
"That is true," he admitted, it seemed almost reluctantly. I supposed if Hurtha had encountered Boabissia under somewhat different circumstances his relationship to her would have been considerably different, for example, if he had bought her in a slave market. Her background with the wagons had perhaps, rightly or wrongly, inhibited him somewhat, I feared, keeping him from viewing her as what she essentially was, a rather juicy possibility for a female.
"You do want to be safe, don't you?" I asked Boabissia.
"Of course, of course," she said, irritably.
"Then perhaps you should not object to the occasional chaining out of slaves." I said.
"Perhaps," she said.
"And perhaps you should veil yourself."
"Nonsense," she said.
"But you do want to be safe?" I asked.
"Of course," she said.
"Then veil yourself," I said.

- Mercenaries


And it is worthy of note that the quote also says "uncompanioned" free girls.

quote:
Some low-class, uncompanioned, free girls do not wear veils.


Note that low-class does NOT mean low caste. Does the quote raise the question that Men would and did insist on propriety in their companions? Personally, it re-inforces my belief that it primarily refers to she-urts, but that is obviously open for debate as to *who* these low class uncompanioned FW are. It does state clearly though that they are uncompanioned, whoever they are.

The public exposure of the features of a free woman is a socially serious matter in many Gorean localities

quote:
"It must be understood, of course, to fully appreciate what was going on, that the public exposure of the features of a freewoman, particularly one of high caste, or with some pretense to position or status, is a socially serious matter in many Gorean localities. Indeed, in some cities an unveiled free woman is susceptible to being taken into custody by guardsmen, then to be veiled, by force if necessary, and publicly conducted back to her home. Indeed, in some cities she is marched back to her home stripped, except for the face veil which has been put on her. In these cases a crowd usually follows, to see to what home it is that she is to be returned. Repeated offenses in such a city usually result in the enslavement of the female.

Such serious measures, of course, are seldom required to protect such familiar Gorean proprieties. Custom, by itself, normally suffices."
Players


Certain bold free women neglect the veils. Can we really believe it is no big deal? Sure, we have the quotes to say it happened - that there were women who went out of their quarters without them at times. Does the fact that a few did mean that nothing happened to them? That everything was hunky dory?

Nope.

quote:
An unveiled woman, for example, may find other women turning away from her in a market, perhaps with expressions of disgust.

Indeed, she may not even be waited upon, or dealt with, in a market by a free woman unless she first kneels. It would not be unusual for her, in a crowded place, to overhear remarks, perhaps whispers or sneers, of which she is the obvious object, such as "Shameless slut," "brazen baggage," "As immodest as a slave," "I wonder who her master is," and "Put a collar on her!"

And if she should attempt to confront or challenge her assailants, she will merely find such remarks repeated articulately and clearly to her face."
Players

Tired of seeing ads? Click here to upgrade to Elite Membership!


ChatArea.com Help & News Forums | Terms of Use | Contact ChatArea.com | Advertising

Powered By ChatArea.com - Get your free Society today! © Copyright 2003 Wewp!