| Tired of seeing ads? Click here to upgrade to Elite Membership! |
|
|
| Author | Message / Information |
|
nitiram
|
William Ewart Barker
replied on: 3/4/2008 2:44:24 PM Thank you Jenny for this information. Have now registered myself on this site as i have so many fond memories of Heanor where my fathers family were born and brought up. I was born at loscoe but lived in Heanor for a while too. |
|
RMMee
Moderator |
William Ewart Barker
replied on: 3/3/2008 3:10:19 PM Brilliant Jenny. I have passed a message to the enquirer asking them to view this thread. Thanks as always |
|
Jennypeg
Researcher |
William Ewart Barker
replied on: 3/3/2008 1:54:45 PM Conscientious Objector Arrested April 13th 1916 Heanor Observer Heanor man handed over to an escort at a special sitting of the Ilkeston magistrates yesterday, William Ewart Barker 54, John Street, Heanor, grocery branch manager, was brought before the Mayor (Mr. J. A. MacDonald) Mr C Maltby and Dr Wood, for failing as a member of the Army Reserve, to appear at the time and place at which he was required to attend at Ilkeston, on April 6th Mr C. L. Rothera, of Nottingham appeared for prisoner, who pleaded not guilty. Major Sarll, recruitment officer gave evidence that prisoner claimed total exemption as a conscientious objector, at the Heanor tribunal on 7th March, and was granted a certificate of exemption from combatant service only. He was notified that he must attend at Ilkeston on April 6th but he failed to do so, and he was reported to the police, who arrested him. He (Major Sarll) asked that he might be handed over to be dealt with by the military authorities. Mr. Rothera said he was going to ask the bench to determine a question and gave a very strong decision on one point. The position of the conscientious objector in the Country was a very serious one. The intentions of a legislature had been very largely ignored, and he was going to ask the bench to say that prisoner did not come under the military law. Having quoted Mr Bonar Law and Lord Landsowne Mr Rothera went on to say that the tribunals in the Country had in large degree refused to be influenced by the genuineness of conscientious objectors did not get the benefit of the act the legislature clearly intended he should have. The Major said Mr Rothera could not expect them to sit there and to go into that question. Mr Rothera said he asked permission to satisfy the bench that his client was a conscientious objector. He was a member of a religious organisation and was a Sunday School Teacher. The Mayor: all that would be gone into by the tribunal, which had given its decision. Have you any evidence that he is not an absentee? He had not disputed that he has not answered the call. After consulting in private the Mayor said the military authorities did not press for a penalty, and on that account the bench would waver it. Prisoner had appeared before two tribunals and it was his duty to respond to the call of his Country, when he would be given such service as was considered suitable. Their decision was that he be handed over to an escort. |
|
Jennypeg
Researcher |
William Ewart Barker
replied on: 3/2/2008 11:09:18 AM like Suzard say's there will be something in the newspapers, I will have a look next week. Jenny |
|
suzard
Researcher |
William Ewart Barker
replied on: 3/2/2008 11:01:08 AM There was a list every week of applications to be exonerated from duty, etc in R&H and sometimes the Gazette. There should be a report -although sometimes it is just one line and other times there is a little bit of background information. |
|
RMMee
Moderator |
William Ewart Barker
replied on: 3/2/2008 7:10:40 AM Does anyone know whether reports of trials of Conscientious Objectors appeared during the First World War? I don't think I have ever seen one. The query I have received is as follows: "My grandfather William Ewart Barker (date of birth 21st September 1887) of Heanor was court martialled as a concientious objector on 6th May 1916 at Budbrooke Barracks, Warwick. He was arrested on or around the 12th April 1916 and brought before a magistrates court in Heanor on 12th April 1916. Would this have been reported in the local press at the time do you think?" |
| Tired of seeing ads? Click here to upgrade to Elite Membership! |
ChatArea.com Help & News Forums | Terms of Use | Contact ChatArea.com | Advertising
Powered By ChatArea.com - Get your free Society today! © Copyright 2003 Wewp!