| Tired of seeing ads? Click here to upgrade to Elite Membership! |
|
|
| Author | Message / Information |
|
LiveWire
|
heyhey TimMyth
replied on: 5/29/2003 7:09:01 PM ok a couple last questions.. for now ive done this math two times and im wondering what im leaving out. a. @1750 acres @42000 plat/hour @dwarfs @20% per building smithys: reduce warrior cost to 874 plat per. total warriors per hour using only smithys= 48.05 alchs: provide an exta 15400 plat(with midas only). total warriors per hour using only alchs= 49.9 b. @1500 @50000 plat/hour @icekin @20% per building smithys: reduce ice elemental cost to 684 plat per. total ice elems per hour using only smithys= 73.09 alchs: provide an extra 13800 plat(with midas and racial bonus only). total ice elems per hour using only alchs= 70.9 just for clarification i just used random figures for acerage and plat per hour. what i thought i was finding was that alchs are better than smithys always. what i think im actually finding is alchs are better then smithys only with a high draft rate? help here pls. also, can you show so math about masonries being more useful than alch/smithy? or is that a situational thing as well. if so when are masonries better than alchs or smithies. |
| Tired of seeing ads? Click here to upgrade to Elite Membership! |
ChatArea.com Help & News Forums | Terms of Use | Contact ChatArea.com | Advertising
Powered By ChatArea.com - Get your free Society today! © Copyright 2003 Wewp!