quote:

---

quote:

---

OK then, what else would you call the assemblage of a non-rational worldview unanswerable to either predictive empiricism or mathematical consistency, if not pseudo-science?

Religion?

---

Put another way, what I'm asking is how can the Mitton threads be consisdered scientific when they haven't given rise to a single repeatable experiment or consistent set of equations?

Until such time as they do, they'll just remain at the level of entertaining analogy.

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

OK then, what else would you call the assemblage of a non-rational worldview unanswerable to either predictive empiricism or mathematical consistency, if not pseudo-science?

Religion?

---

Put another way, what I'm asking is how can the Mitton threads be consisdered scientific when they haven't given rise to a single repeatable experiment or consistent set of equations?

Until such time as they do, they'll just remain at the level of entertaining analogy.

---

Since my earlier contributions to this thread I have been sitting back and watching things develop.These early quotes from m8e indicate something which I don't quite understand. If he's so keen on his cutting edge theorists, why is he so stultifyingly committed to sabotaging the Mitton threads as experiment. It is clear that at the heart of this matter is the need to emphasize that the London writers who have been mentioned are codifying their texts in some way. The last few postings which have discussed both Stewart Home and Iain Sinclair have quite convincingly argued that their writings have in a coded manner, replied to the Mitton text as he has presented it in his novel. There would appear to be good evidence for this. M8e should therefore argue against this evidence but seemingly is unable to do so. If this continues his contributions are futile and constitute the actions of a boorish idiot. Much scientific investigation is by necessity tedious and requiring attention to minutiae or in this case textual complexity.
The immediate phenomenon under investigation, it seems, is the sudden appearance ( in terms of this particular thread - as text) of this play at the Crescent theatre that must obviously feature Mad Sir Jack Mytton at a point in our discourse when the very same had just been mentioned. This is of course a very odd but interesting coincidence and would therefore be considered as part of a pattern if it is placed next to all the other acausal phenomena that have supposedly happened.This is what we are examining and itself may be considered 'text'.
The theory under question is therefore that Charlie Mitton is a conduit for these synchronicities and and that this may or may not be called a strange faculty. I'm open to all possibilities and believe that at this point we have very strong evidence. It's just that the evidence exists in different texts and these texts may include both the fictional and non-fictional discourse of the contributors. All of the people that have contributed to this site are to greater and lesser degrees involved in this and I am therefore exasperated by m8e's continual attempts to break this code by trying to expose the people behind the names. He is, by the rules of the experiment, breaking this code and therefore sabotaging the experiment.I can only conclude that this is being done for egotistical reasons.

---

quote:

---

I see our old friend Sinclair is on The Culture Show tonight, discussing the work of Alan Moore (7.00 BBC2, repeated at 11.20).

---

quote:

---

OK then, what else would you call the assemblage of a non-rational worldview unanswerable to either predictive empiricism or mathematical consistency, if not pseudo-science?

Religion?

Put another way, what I'm asking is how can the Mitton threads be consisdered scientific when they haven't given rise to a single repeatable experiment or consistent set of equations?

Until such time as they do, they'll just remain at the level of entertaining analogy.


People are going to start thinking you're obsessed with me if you're not careful Chas.

---

quote:

---

Go to p.24 of the 'Lord Charles Mitton' thread and you will find out what the Tristero really means.



.......Or what trystero means. I've just read this after reaching p.237(!) of 'Faithfull' by Marianne Faithfull:

"...I was the character in the song. You have to be careful what you write because a song is a gateway, and whatever it is you've summoned up may come through."

---

quote:

---

"OK then, what else would you call the assemblage of a non-rational worldview unanswerable to either predictive empiricism or mathematical consistency, if not pseudo-science?"

The big question for me as a scientist, is to ask whether this project has anything to offer in terms of phenomena to our community. I must answer with a resounding YES.
There are myriad examples of very tightly constructed geometries and I agree with others on the thread that at this point m8e is becoming a bore.The contributors themselves have had to use a code and their real identities are irrelevant. What we are trying to establish is whether these geometries hold water.

---

quote:

---

I see our old friend Sinclair is on The Culture Show tonight, discussing the work of Alan Moore (7.00 BBC2, repeated at 11.20).

---

quote:

---

Interestingly, in the section on Alan Moores' inspirations the BBC website Watch Again feature edits out two. Neither 'John Dee' or the 'Philosophers of Magick' appear although I explicitly remember Moore mentioning both.

---

quote:

---

m8es a prat then and a codebreaker.worse still.

---